President-elect vowed to drain the swamp in Washington but critics say key roles for business elite is not the way
Earlier this month, Donald Trump used a thank-you rally in Des Moines, Iowa, to give his supporters further insight into the deal-making team he intends to build in Washington. As president-elect, Trump has so far nominated a number of billionaires, three Goldman Sachs bankers and the chief executive of the worlds largest oil firm to senior positions. Responding to liberal consternation at the sheer wealth of the prospective appointees, Trump told his audience: A newspaper [the New York Times] criticised me and said: Why cant they have people of modest means? Because I want people that made a fortune. Because now they are negotiating for you, OK? Its no different than a great baseball player or a great golfer.
Trumps cabinet, which is not yet fully filled, is already said to be worth a combined $14bn the richest White House top table ever assembled. His team if all are confirmed by the Senate will be worth 50 times the $250m combined wealth of George W Bushs first cabinet, which the media at the time dubbed the team of millionaires. For Trump, those figures are simply a confirmation of competence: in Trumpian politics, the richer you are, the better you must be at cutting a deal. And deal-making is what the next White House will be all about.
Throughout his campaign, Trump repeatedly returned to the theme of the terrible deals cut by previous administrations, from the North American Free Trade Agreement trade deal to the nuclear deal with Iran.
He described the Nafta with Canada and Mexico as the worst trade deal maybe ever; the Iran nuclear pact was a disaster and the worst deal ever negotiated, and would be ripped up. China, was a big abuser through artificially depressing its currency to give its exports a boost at the expense of US jobs. The implication was that, under the leadership of Trump, America Inc would finally begin to punch its weight in the market of global diplomacy.
According to Peter Henning, a constitutional law professor at Wayne State University, appointing business leaders to top political positions has become the norm in American politics, but Trumps nominations were unique in the volume of people with minimal, if any, government experience.
I am always wary of people who say we have to run the country like a business businesses arent responsible for defence or caring for the elderly, he said. Businesses are driven with one guiding principle to make the most money and that should not be the role of the government.
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/18/donald-trump-senate-backlash-cabinet-of-billionaires